03/05/2025

Cryptocurrency myths. What’s true and what’s fiction?

As cryptocurrencies continue to disrupt traditional finance, they’ve also become a breeding ground for myths and misconceptions. For newcomers and seasoned investors alike, separating fact from fiction can be challenging. In this guide, we’ll tackle some of the most persistent crypto myths, debunk them with facts, and provide a clearer picture of the crypto landscape.
Cryptocurrency myths. What’s true and what’s fiction?

Myth 1. Cryptocurrencies are only used for illegal activities

One of the most persistent myths about cryptocurrencies is that they are mainly used for illegal activities, such as money laundering, drug trafficking, and other crimes. This misconception gained traction after the Silk Road incident, where Bitcoin was used for transactions on the darknet. However, the reality is starkly different.

The truth behind the myth

According to a report by Chainalysis, illicit transactions accounted for only 0.24% of all cryptocurrency activities in 2022. In comparison, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimates that 2-5% of global GDP, equivalent to $800 billion to $2 trillion, is linked to illicit activities using traditional fiat currencies.
Why this myth persists:
  • Media sensationalism. News outlets often highlight crypto-related crimes disproportionately.

  • Misunderstanding of blockchain. Many assume blockchain is completely anonymous, while in reality, it offers transparency.

  • Historical incidents. Cases like Silk Road have left a lasting impression despite changes in the industry.

Moreover, blockchain's transparent and traceable nature makes it easier for law enforcement to track and combat financial crimes. Agencies like the FBI have used blockchain analysis to dismantle criminal networks, proving that crypto’s supposed anonymity is more myth than reality.

Therefore, the notion that cryptocurrencies are predominantly used for illegal activities is a myth rooted in outdated perceptions.

Cryptocurrency myths. What’s true and what’s fiction?

Myth 2. Bitcoin has no intrinsic value

A widespread myth is that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have no intrinsic value because they are not backed by physical assets like gold or fiat currencies. This argument overlooks the fundamental principles of value, which stem from utility, scarcity, and network effects. 

Bitcoin's value is derived from its decentralized network, security, and limited supply of 21 million coins. Unlike fiat currencies, which can be inflated by central banks, Bitcoin’s scarcity makes it an attractive store of value. Additionally, Bitcoin's security model, based on Proof-of-Work (PoW) and the immense computational power securing its network, ensures its resilience against attacks, further enhancing its value proposition. 

Institutional adoption also plays a significant role in Bitcoin's value. Companies like Tesla and MicroStrategy have added Bitcoin to their balance sheets, citing its potential as a hedge against inflation. Furthermore, Bitcoin's utility as a medium of exchange is expanding, with companies such as PayPal and Square enabling crypto payments. 

In reality, Bitcoin's intrinsic value is a combination of its scarcity, security, and growing adoption. The myth that Bitcoin lacks intrinsic value fails to acknowledge the evolving financial paradigm.

Myth 3. Cryptocurrencies are too volatile to be reliable

Another common myth is that cryptocurrencies are too volatile to serve any real purpose in finance. While it is true that the prices of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum can swing dramatically, this volatility is often misunderstood and oversimplified. Understanding the factors behind these price movements is essential for a balanced perspective.

Understanding сrypto volatility

1. Emerging market

Cryptocurrencies represent a relatively young and rapidly growing asset class. As with any emerging market, higher volatility is a natural consequence of limited liquidity, speculative interest, and evolving infrastructure. The early days of the Internet and tech stocks saw similar volatility, which subsided as the market matured.

2. Institutional involvement

Increased participation from institutional investors is helping stabilize prices. As major financial institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Goldman Sachs expand their crypto offerings, the influx of institutional capital brings liquidity and reduces sharp price fluctuations. Additionally, the approval of Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) has introduced new avenues for mainstream investors, further mitigating volatility.

3. Risk management tools

The rise of stablecoins and derivatives like futures, options, and perpetual contracts has provided effective ways to manage volatility. For example, Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) are pegged to the US dollar, offering a safe harbor during market swings. Meanwhile, advanced traders utilize derivatives to hedge risks, making the crypto market more resilient than perceived.

4. Diverse volatility levels

Not all cryptocurrencies are equally volatile. While smaller altcoins may experience significant price swings, established assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum show decreasing volatility over time due to higher liquidity and institutional interest. Moreover, projects with clear use cases and strong development teams tend to have more stable valuations.

5. Market sentiment and news impact

Cryptocurrency prices are highly sensitive to news, regulatory developments, and macroeconomic factors. For instance, announcements about SEC regulations or Bitcoin halving events can cause temporary price spikes or drops. Understanding these triggers helps investors navigate volatility more effectively.

Thus, the myth that cryptocurrencies are "too volatile" ignores the nuanced differences between crypto assets, the rapid evolution of risk management tools, and the growing maturity of the market. As the ecosystem expands, volatility is expected to stabilize further, making cryptocurrencies an increasingly reliable asset class.

Cryptocurrency myths. What’s true and what’s fiction?

Myth 4. Cryptocurrency mining destroys the environment

The environmental impact of cryptocurrency mining, especially Bitcoin, is a topic of heated debate. The myth suggests that mining's energy consumption is unsustainable and destructive to the environment. However, this narrative often lacks context and overlooks key developments and innovations aimed at making crypto mining more sustainable.

Green mining initiatives
  • Renewable energy usage. Over 58% of Bitcoin's energy comes from renewable sources such as hydropower, wind, and solar, making it one of the most sustainable large-scale industries. This shift is driven by mining companies relocating to regions with abundant renewable energy.

  • Flare gas mining. Innovative methods like flare gas mining capture otherwise wasted energy from oil drilling sites. By converting flared natural gas into electricity for mining, this approach not only reduces waste but also cuts carbon emissions that would have been released into the atmosphere.

  • Transition to PoS. Ethereum’s move to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) has reduced its energy consumption by over 99%, setting a powerful precedent for other blockchain networks. Unlike the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW), PoS validates transactions based on token holdings, significantly lowering the carbon footprint.

These advancements highlight the industry's commitment to sustainability and challenge the simplistic view that cryptocurrency mining is inherently harmful to the environment. As the crypto ecosystem evolves, the focus on renewable energy and efficient protocols is likely to grow, making the myth of crypto's devastating environmental impact increasingly outdated.

Cryptocurrency myths. What’s true and what’s fiction?

Myth 5. Governments will ban cryptocurrencies

One of the most alarming myths is the belief that governments will outright ban cryptocurrencies, rendering investments worthless. While countries like China have imposed stringent restrictions, the broader global trend is towards regulation, not prohibition.

In the United States, regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are working to integrate cryptocurrencies into the financial system through comprehensive regulatory frameworks. The European Union has also proposed the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, aiming to protect consumers while encouraging innovation.

Furthermore, the rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) suggests that governments see the potential in blockchain technology rather than dismissing it outright. Countries like China, Sweden, and Nigeria have already launched or are piloting CBDCs, which implies a coexistence with cryptocurrencies rather than a blanket ban.

In reality, governments are more focused on regulation than prohibition. The myth of an impending ban ignores the nuanced and collaborative approach most governments are taking.

Debunking myths for a clearer perspective

The world of cryptocurrencies is complex and often misunderstood due to myths and misconceptions. By separating fact from fiction, investors can make more informed decisions and appreciate the true potential of this innovative technology.

Key takeaways

  • Cryptocurrencies are not primarily used for illicit activities.

  • Bitcoin has intrinsic value based on scarcity, security, and adoption.

  • Volatility is a characteristic of emerging markets, not a flaw.

  • The environmental impact of mining is being actively mitigated.

  • Governments are moving towards regulation, not bans.

For potential investors and enthusiasts alike, the key is continuous education. Understanding the fundamentals, recognizing the risks, and staying updated on regulatory developments can help navigate the crypto landscape with confidence.

In a rapidly changing financial world, being well-informed is the best way to capitalize on the opportunities that cryptocurrencies offer.

Recent Articles